Original article / research
Year :
2016 |
Month :
October
|
Volume :
5 |
Issue :
4 |
Page :
MO25 - MO28 |
Full Version
|
|
Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Clinical Isolates of Enterococci from Blood Samples in A Tertiary Care Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India
|
Pooja A Kamaria, Binita J Aring, Mala Sinha 1. Resident, Department of Microbiology, M.P. Shah Medical College Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
2. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, M.P. Shah Medical College Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
3. Professor, Department of Microbiology, M.P. Shah Medical College Jamnagar, Gujarat, India.
|
|
Correspondence
Address :
Pooja A Kamaria, Binita J Aring, Mala Sinha, Dr. Pooja A Kamaria,
160, Chitrakutdham Society, B/H Crystal Mall,
Kalawad Road, Rajkot-360005, Gujrat, India.
E-mail: Pooja.kamaria@gmail.com
|
| ABSTRACT | | : Introduction: In recent years, enterococci have become important nosocomial pathogens. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics, prolonged hospital stay, severity of illness and immunosuppression are responsible for nosocomial acquisition of drug resistant enterococci.
Aim: To determine the prevalence and anti-microbial resistance pattern of enterococci in blood samples.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, Shri M. P. Shah Government Medical College, Jamnagar, Gujarat from January 2014 to June 2014. A total of 540 blood samples were tested. The isolates were identified by grams staining, colony characteristics, catalase test, black color on bile esculin agar and tolerance to 6.5% NaCl. Antibiotic susceptibility test was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for Penicillin (10 units), Azithromycin (30 mcg), Gentamicin (10 mcg), Ciprofloxacin (5 mcg), Tetracycline (30 mcg), Linezolid (30 mcg) and Vancomycin (30 mcg).
Results: The prevalence rate of enterococci in blood samples was 6.48%. Antibiotic susceptibility tests showed high level resistance to commonly used antibiotics like Penicillin (100%), Azithromycin (85.71%), Gentamicin (100%), Ciprofloxacin (82.85%) & Tetracycline (77.14%) and spread to newer drugs like Linezolid (5.71%) and Vancomycin (8.57%).
Conclusion: We conclude that enterococcal strains with high level of resistance to penicillin aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones group of drugs. So there is urgent need for more rational and restricted use of antimicrobials and continuous monitoring, in order to minimize the selection and to prevent hospital spread of such strains. |
|
Keywords
: Antimicrobial resistance, Blood stream infections, Vancomycin. |
|
DOI and Others
: 10.7860/NJLM/2016/22494:2179 |
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
Blood stream infections are an important cause of mortality and morbidity and they are among the most common health care associated infections (1). Diseases which are associated with blood stream infections can be self limited infections or it may lead to life threatening sepsis, it needs aggressive and prompt antimicrobial therapy (2).
Bacteraemia and meningitis may occur in neonates and in adults it may lead to endocarditis. In both the sex, enteroccocal infection is equally distributed (3). Vancomycin resistant Enterococci (VRE) sepsis is emerging as a significant problem in the intensive care setting (4).
The treatment of multidrug resistance is a big challenge for the clinicians. Resistance to beta lactam and glycopeptides is now a common feature of many hospital isolates of enterococci, and resistance to linezolid and aminoglycosides also leads to problem (5).
Risk factors like indiscriminate use of antibiotics, prolonged hospital stay, severity of illness and immunosuppression are responsible for nosocomial acquisition of drug resistant enterococci ultimately leading to environmental contamination and cross infections (6),(7). Resistance mechanism to enterococci can be intrinsic, that is naturally occurring antibiotic resistance. It can be rapidly acquired by plasmids (8), gene transfer (9) and/or by mutation (10).
The increasing resistance to antibacterial agents such as penicillins, aminoglycosides, and also to glycopeptides such as vancomycin, created an increasingly worrisome problem in clinical practice (11),(12),(13). Present study was carried out for the determination of the enterococcal blood stream infections, its prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern.
|
|
|
Material and Methods |
|
This retrospective study was carried out at Department of Microbiology M. P. Shah Government Medical College and GG Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India, from January 2014 to June 2014. Fresh blood sample were collected and added immediately to sterile glucose broth aseptically. We have included blood samples and excluded other samples like urine, pus, tissue, stool and body fluids in the study. A total of 540 blood samples were received from the Pediatric and Medicine wards of the GG Hospital, Jamnagar.
Blood culture bottles were incubated overnight at 37°C in incubator. After incubation the next day samples were cultured on primary isolation media MacConkey agar, blood agar media and nutrient agar for biochemical test and the next day, culture was done on selective medium Bile Esculin agar. Colony characteristics on MacConkey agar medium was pin-point pink lactose fermenting colonies and colony characteristic on blood agar was non hemolytic and approx. size of 0.5-1mm. Enterococcal isolates were identified by using standard tests like examining the colony morphology, gram staining, the catalase test, black color on bile esculin agar and the salt tolerance test to 6.5% NaCl. On Hanging Drop preparation, they were non-motile. Antibiotic sensitivity test was done for the positive samples for enterococci, according to the CLSI(Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines (14) for penicillin (10 units), azithromycin (30mcg), Ciprofloxacin (5mcg), Tetracycline (30mcg), Linezolid (30mcg) and Vancomycin (30mcg) by the KirbyBauer disc diffusion method using Mueller Hinton (MH) agar plates (14). ATCC Enterococcus faecalis 29212 was used as a control strain.
Ethical Clearance: it is a retrospective analysis of samples tested for routine laboratory diagnosis; hence ethical clearance is not necessary.
Statistics Analysis
Data was entered and analyzed in MS excel 2007.
|
|
|
Results |
|
Out of 540 blood samples, 35(6.48%) of blood samples were positive for enterococci and 505(93.52%) were negative for enterococci. So the Prevalence rate for enterococci was 6.48%. (Table/Fig 1) shows positivity rate for enterococci spps. Species identification was not done for the enterococci.
Age and sex wise distribution of patients was done, (Table/Fig 2). The maximum numbers of isolates 57.14% were seen in the 0-20 years age group followed by 22.85% in the 21-40 years age group. More numbers of enterococci were isolated from males (60%) than from females (40%).
(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4) shows the resistance pattern of the enterococci. Resistance to penicillin and gentamicin was 100% for the enterococci. Resistance to Azithromycin, Ciprofloxacin and Tetracycline was 85.71%, 82.85% and 77.14% respectively. Resistance also starts to develop to some higher antibiotics like Vancomycin & Linezolid that are 8.57% and 5.71% respectively.
|
|
|
Discussion |
|
In the present study, the prevalence of Enterococcus isolates from the blood samples was 6.48% as shown in table-1. Study of Olawale KO et al., shows the prevalence rate was 5.9%, which is almost similar to present study (15).
Present study shows that highest number of enterococci about 57.14% were isolated from 0-20 years age group followed by 22.85% in 21-40 years age group as shown in (Table/Fig 2). Almost similar result has been noticed in study of Anjana Telkar et al., (16) with more involvement of pediatric patients or teenagers with 54% cases followed by adult group with 30% cases. Study shows that enterococci were more common in pediatric patients or teenagers and could be associated with central nervous system infection while adult group could be associated with endocarditis (3).
As shown in (Table/Fig 2), 60% of males were affected to enterococcal blood stream infections as compared to 40% of females. Similar study was done by Anjana Telkar et al., it shows that 64% of males were affected to enterococcal blood stream infections as compared to 36% of females (16). The reason for more enterococcal blood stream infections in male might be due to more exposure by male patients to environmental conditions that may lead to enterococcal infection. It might be due to some unexplained reasons. However, clinically there is no correlation between sex and Enterococcus infection and almost both sexes are equally affected (3).
Comparative study of Anjana Telkar et al., shows that, there was multidrug resistance to enterococci isolates and it shows that more than 50% resistance was seen to most of the drugs. In that study resistance to Linezolid and Vancomycin were 2.8% and 12% respectively (16). Other study done by S. Sreeja et al., shows that resistance to Penicillin and Ciprofloxacin were 47% and 50% respectively (17). Other recent studies had been done in the tertiary care hospitals in india for vancomycin resistance and showed that it may range between 1.7-20% (18),(19),(20),(21).
The result of disc diffusion method can be inaccurate and can lead to utilization of this drug for treatment. So for the important antibiotics like vancomycin, MIC monitoring should be done before reporting as intermediate sensitive or resistant (22). The imprudent use of vancomycin and non-compliance with the infection control measures lead to emergence of VRE (Vancomycin resistant enterococci) (21).
|
|
|
Conclusion |
|
There is high level of resistance to penicillin, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides group of drugs. So there is urgent need for more rational and restricted use of antimicrobials, in order to minimize the selection and to prevent such strains that spread in the hospital premises.
|
|
| 1. | Diekam DJ, Beekman SE, Chapin KC. The epidemiology and the outcome of nosocomial and community onset blood stream infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3655-60. | 2. | Young IS. Sepsis syndrome. In : Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R, eds. Principle and practice of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone, 1995; 690-705. | 3. | Gordon S, Swenson JM, Hill BC, Piggot NE, Facklam RR, Cooksey RC, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of common and unusual species of enterococci causing infections in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2373–78. | 4. | Choudhry O, Gathwala G, Singh J. Vancomycin resistant enterococci in neonatal ICU-A Rising menace. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;77:1446-47. | 5. | Arias CA, Murray BE. Emergence and management of drugresistant enterococcal infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:637–55. | 6. | Donskey CJ, Chowdhry TK, Hecker MT. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients. N Eng J Med. 2000; 343: 1925- 32. | 7. | Karmarker MG, Gershom ES, Mehta PR. Enteroccocal infection with special reference to phenotypic characterization and drug resistance. Indian J Med Res. 2004;119: 22-25. | 8. | Dunny GM, Leonard BA, Hedberg PJ. Pheromone-inducible conjugation in Enterococcus faecalis: inter bacterial and host parasite chemical communication. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:871. | 9. | Arias CA, Reye SJ, Zuniga M. Multi-centre surveillance of the antimicrobial resistance in enterococci and staphylococci form Colombian hospitals. J Antimicrobial Chemother. 2003;51:59- 68. | 10. | Mundy LM, Satim DF, Gilmore M. Relationships between the enterococcal virulence and the antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:513-22. | 11. | Stern CS, CarvalhoMda G, Teixeira LM. Characterization of enterococci isolated `from human and non-human sources in Brazil. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994; 20:61-67. | 12. | Bambeke FV, Chauvel M, Reynolds P. Vancomycin- dependent Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolates and revertant mutants. Antimicro Agents chemother. 1999;43:41-47. | 13. | Coque TM, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. Characterization of dihydrofolate reductase genes from trimethoprim–susceptible and trimethoprim-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecalis. Antimicro Agents Chemother. 1999;43:141-47. | 14. | CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014. | 15. | Olawale KO, Fadiora SO. Prevalence of hospital-acquired enterococci infections in two primary-care hospitals in Osogbo, Southwestern Nigeria. Afr J Infect Dis. 2011; 5(2): 40–46. | 16. | Telkar A, Baragundi MC, Raghvendra VP, Vishwanath G, Chandrappa NR. Change in the prevalence and the antibiotic resistance of the enterococcal species, isolated from blood cultures. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(3):405-07. | 17. | Sreeja S, Babu P R S, Prathab AG. The prevalence and the characterization of the Enterococcus species from various clinical samples in a tertiary care hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(9):1486-88. | 18. | Mulla S, Patel KG, Panwala T, Rewadiwala S.The prevalence of enterococci with a higher resistance level in a tertiary care hospital: A matter of concern. National J Med Res. 2012 2(1):25- 27. | 19. | Vidyalakshmi PR, Gopalakrishnan R, Ramasubramanian V, Ghafur AK, Nambi PS, Thirunarayana MA. The clinical, epidemiological, and the microbiological profiles of the patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci from a tertiary care hospital. J Global Infect Dis. 2012;4(2):137-38. | 20. | Chaudhary U, Shamma M, Yadav A, The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the common and the unusual enterococcus species which were isolated from clinical specimens. J Infect Dis Antimicrob Agents. 2007 24(2):55-62. | 21. | Devi PS, Rao SP, Shivananda PG. The characterization, antibiotic susceptibility pattern and the detection of beta-lactamases in Enterococci. Indian J of Pathol Mcrobiol. 2002 45(1):79-82. | 22. | Karmarkar MG, Gershom SE, Mehta PR. The enterococcal infections with a special reference to the phenotypic characterization and the drug resistance. Indian J Med Res. 2004;119:22-25. [ Google Scholar]
|
|
|
TABLES AND FIGURES | |
|
|
|
|
|